|
|
Some Quotes about the Kodak 35 RF appearance
The Kodak 35RF (RangeFinder) camera has won very few accolades for it's appearance. Here are some comments I have picked up from sites discussing the Kodak 35RF and from eBay listings. "A face only a mother could love." "Some think it rates as one of the ugliest cameras made." "Ugly duckling." The strange thing is, when I was a teenager and bought my Kodak 35RF, I don't recall any such thoughts. I was just excited to have my own 35mm camera with adjustments and a coupled rangefinder |
|
|
I'm no expert
In the past 50 years I have handled a lot of cameras, run film though a good many old cameras, and have a general knowledge of a great many collectible cameras. Rarely do I get involved in research, tearing down or other in depth studies that would make me an expert. I have seen some statements about the Kodak 35RF that I do believe need correcting though. Names and resources will not be mentioned because I don't think that is fair to them, nor am I wanting to put down individuals I know in general are far more expert than myself about most cameras they discuss. (1) in a discussion of Kodak Anastigmat Special and Kodak Anastar lenses I found this statement on an internet site, "....the main difference is that the Anastar lens is coated." A Kodak information sheet (copyright 1946, identified as 8-46-CH on the back) states that there were Lumenized (name of Kodak's coating) Kodak Anastigmat Special lenses. To the left is a coated Anastigmat Special, vintage 1947 based on using the code "Camerosity" (ES = 47). Speaking of vintages of Kodak 35RF, I have seen articles suggesting two different time ranges: 1940-48 and 1940-51. I favor the later being the correct one since I have a lens with an ET (1949) serial number and saw one listed on eBay with an RY (1950) lens serial number. One more item on the lens. I read at one time, and I can't find the resource right now, that the Kodak Anastigmat Special was the same formula as the Ektar, but that due to the front element focusing Kodak did not feel it came up to Ektar standards thoughout the focus range.
|
|
More to think about:
Here is my recently added pre-WW II Kodak 35RF. Several differences from the post war versions I have seen so far are "A", a shorter slot for the red shutter cocked warning, and "B", the rewind is marked "rewind" with an arrow. After the war, this became a film reminder. Also, the knobs look like the postwar knobs with ridges, but color is more of a stainless steel color instead of brushed aluminum. On the "A" slot, this 1942 version has the short slot, about 7/32" long, but a recently listed eBay 1941 version had the longer slot, about 3/8" long, you see on the post war versions. The take-up spindle on this camera is black, and all my post war take-up spindles are chrome. SEE GUEST BOOK PAGE FOR PHOTO OF BOTH SPINDLES. I am having trouble finding good authoritative information so far on the Kodak 35RF. Maybe it isn't a very exciting camera to research - unless it was your first camera.
|
|
|